Above the Fold: Leaded skies; Of gains, losses
Giovanni Arechavaleta

Above the Fold: Leaded skies; Of gains, losses

News that drives the discussion, hand-picked by our journalists and researchers

Top news of the day for Thursday, Oct. 26, 2017


1. Today's top read: Getting the lead out.

It is National Lead Poisoning Prevention Week—designed to raise awareness about children's exposure to the toxic—and there are a handful of a stories highlighting the continued contamination of people and the environment.

Scientists Rachel Shaffer, Steven Gilbert wrote a piece for us today, asking.

Why is toxic leaded gas still used in piston-engine planes, tainting nearby water, soil and children?

Also:

2. Are we too gloom and doom?

Nautilus has an interview with Chris Thomas, a professor of conservation biology at the University of York in England, author of the new book, Inheritors of the Earth: How Nature Is Thriving in an Age of Extinction.

They talk of the modern mass extinction and how we perhaps focus too much on the losses, forgetting the gains.

"As environmental managers and conservationists, we should start incorporating these gains into our thinking of how we manage the planet, rather than taking a stance of simply trying to fight the losses," Thomas says.

Founder & chief scientist of EHS, publisher of EHN.org, Pete Myers sharply disagrees with Thomas' outlook, saying: "This Pollyannish opinion flies in the face of countless peer-reviewed studies published in the scientific literature over the past several decades."

See the full interview with Thomas here at Nautilus.

In other biodiversity news:

3. Losing homes: Vanishing Salton; Damming Eden; The Uninhabitable Village

  1. Due to increased drought and an altered climate, the Salton Sea's waterline keeps receding. The result? Exposed lakebed that can release tiny particles of dust—triggering breathing problems for those nearby. The Desert Sun has the story on how Salton Sea communities are "no longer a good place to live" for those with respiratory issues.
  2. Water depletion threatens the livelihoods of people who live in the marshlands at the confluence of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers. A damn being built in southeastern Turkey called the Ilisu threatens to starve the marshes of water and destroy the homeland of approximately 125,000 people. See the full story at Hakai Magazine.
  3. Hotter temperatures are forcing families in southern India to decide: Try to survive here, or leave? Full interactive story at NY Times.

4. Dourson confirmed by committee

Strictly along party lines, the Senate Environment Committee approved Michael Dourson's nomination to become an assistant administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.

This is a big step and his controversial nomination now moves to a full Senate vote. Dourson's nomination has been widely criticized by Democrats, who point to his long history of working for chemical manufacturers and downplaying the risks of chemicals.

On yesterday's Senate Environment Committee vote:

Related:

6. China cleanup.

China's big cleanup push continues, now the smoggy nation is urging local authorities to speed up the development of its environmental equipment manufacturing industry, reports Reuters.

This comes as news broke that China shut down up to 40% of its factories in an unprecedented stand against pollution.

7. Remember the March for Science?

From the Atlantic: Six months later, controversy still plagues the March for Science.

Become a donor
Today's top news
From our newsroom

LISTEN: Max Aung on hidden toxic threats

"Seeing how many chemicals we're exposed to is pretty alarming."

Peter Dykstra: Who’s the most influential Republican Senator on climate?

You’ve got three guesses. And your first two are probably wrong.

What is environmental health?

Examining a massive influence on our health: the environment.

Op-ed: Are we getting dumber?

Endocrine-disrupting chemicals are an assault on children’s developing brains.

Op-ed: Reflections on the Supreme Court’s Decision in West Virginia v. EPA

Danger resides in the majority’s having invoked a sweeping “Major Questions Doctrine” to justify its decision in this relatively narrow case.