Print Friendly and PDF
coal power climate

Captive to coal: Indonesia to burn even more fossil fuel for green tech

2 min read

Hans Nicholas Jong reports for Mongabay about Indonesia's coal-fired power plant building spree, which will keep the country addicted to the fossil fuel for the foreseeable future, regardless of its climate commitments.

In a nutshell:

Despite its global climate commitments, Indonesia is proceeding with plans to build coal power plants, particularly "captive" plants dedicated to industrial and commercial consumers, including those in the electric vehicle and battery supply chains. A recent report by the Global Energy Monitor reveals that Indonesia has 18.8 gigawatts of coal power under construction, exceeding most other countries apart from China and India. This surge in coal plants, largely driven by the demand for nickel and battery production, poses challenges to the nation's efforts to transition away from coal and achieve its emission reduction targets.

Key quote:

“There’s more coal power, including captive, that will be built than the capacity that will be retired,” Rere Jambore Christanto, a mining and energy campaign manager at the Indonesian Forum for the Environment, said. “This will increase our emissions, even though we know that our emissions [from the energy sector] should peak in 2030.”

The big picture:

Mongabay's reporting highlights potential pitfalls with the clean energy transition, when dirty energy sources like coal are used in the processing of mineral resources like nickel that power electric vehicles and energy storage systems.

The construction of new coal-fired power plants has significant health and environmental implications. From a public health perspective, these plants emit harmful pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter, which can lead to respiratory illnesses, heart problems and premature deaths among nearby communities. The burning of coal releases greenhouse gases, contributing to climate change and its associated consequences, including rising sea levels, extreme weather events and disruptions to ecosystems. The extraction and transportation of coal can also cause habitat destruction, water pollution and negative impacts on local biodiversity.

Read the article at Mongabay.

EHN has previously reported on the tangible health benefits to the energy transition. For example, swapping out coal energy for solar would prevent 52,000 premature deaths in the U.S. every year, according to a 2017 analysis from Michigan Technological University.

About the author(s):

EHN Staff

Articles written and posted by staff at Environmental Health News

Become a donor
Today's top news

LISTEN: How Western media could better cover climate change in the Middle East

“The whole media of the Western countries don’t do justice to some of the works being done here.”

From our newsroom

Everyone is likely overexposed to BPA

If you're using plastic, you're likely above acceptable health safety levels.

Opinion: The global food system is failing small-scale farmers — here’s how to fix it

Maybe we don’t need Jamaican coffee in the middle of US winter.

LISTEN: Bruce Lanphear on how we’re failing to protect people from pesticides

Lanphear recently resigned as the co-chair of the Health Canada scientific advisory committee on pest control products.

How does cannabis impact developing brains?

As states increasingly legalize or decriminalize marijuana, some experts warn that early exposure may be linked to mental health problems later in life.

Agents of Change in Environmental Justice program accepting applications

Do you find that public voices in science are lacking diversity and want to help create change? We want to hear from you.