NASA

Climate deniers' eclipse viewing guide.

Science, schmience. Now the elitists want us to buy glasses.

Scientists who claim some training in the workings of the human eye are all over the MSM, insisting that the eclipse can only be viewed through a list of viewing devices that they control.


Once again, they're using eclipse alarmism to unnecessarily frighten the public, and they've created a tidy little eclipse-viewing business as the latest way to augment their already-huge paychecks.

Just as America stands virtually alone in rejecting the Paris Climate Accord (thanks, Syria and Nicaragua! Our little Coalition of the Illing!), Monday's total solar eclipse will be pretty much an American home game, with hucksters hawking solar eclipse viewing packages involving hammocks, hot tubs, hookahs and more.

In other words, a science scam, a pointy-headed Ph.D. Ponzi scheme, which, conveniently enough, has the path of the eclipse pointed almost exclusively at the U.S.

Doesn't anybody remember just 13 years ago, when the same frenzy was packaged as a total lunar eclipse? I sure do—shortly after 10pm on October 28, 2004, the Boston Red Sox won their first World Series in 86 years, and 20 minutes later, we were told that God blotted out the moon in celebration.

A shameless cross-promotional tie-in for the national pastime to boot.

We've been told that global warming will make us sick, wipe out our coastlines, and move Spring Break from Padre Island to Winnipeg if we don't drop a few billion into the climate science donation plate.

Now, we're told that enjoying a good, unfettered look at a rare solar eclipse is still one more thing that will make young men go blind before their time. Fool me once ... shame on you. So on Monday, I'll be calling BS on the so-called science.

I won't just be looking straight at the eclipse, I'll be giving it the ol' Stinkeye. Join me if you dare, and together, let's stick a fork in this great global warming swindle, turning a blind eye to Big Science.

So, it's up to all of us: And, as Chico Marx might say, who are you are you gonna believe, your own eyes or your own science?

And you know I'm kidding, right? Don't try this at home, or anywhere else.

Print Friendly and PDF
SUBSCRIBE TO EHN'S MUST-READ DAILY NEWSLETTER: ABOVE THE FOLD
From our Newsroom

A toxic travelogue

The first four stops on a tour tracing American history through its pollution.

Breast cancer: Hundreds of chemicals identified as potential risk factors

Researchers find nearly 300 chemicals linked to breast cancer-contributing hormones in everyday products, and call for a renewed focus on women's exposure risks.

My island does not want to be resilient. We want a reclamation.

Unlearning academic jargon to understand and amplify beauty and power in Puerto Rico.

Measuring Houston’s environmental injustice from space

Satellites show communities of color are far more exposed to pollution in Houston, offering a potential new way to close data gaps and tackle disparities.

Fractured: The body burden of living near fracking

EHN.org scientific investigation finds western Pennsylvania families near fracking are exposed to harmful chemicals, and regulations fail to protect communities' mental, physical, and social health.

The real story behind PFAS and Congress’ effort to clean up contamination: Op-ed

Former EPA official Jim Jones sets the record straight on 'the forever chemical' as lawmakers take up the PFAS Action Act

Above The Fold

Daily & Weekly newsletters all free.