NASA

Commentary: He’s no Ronald Reagan.

Some have compared Trump’s wrecking crew to the one brought in by Ronald Reagan in 1981. But there are crucial differences between then and now.

Commentary: He’s no Ronald Reagan.


December 24, 2016

By Peter Dykstra

Environmental Health News

Follow @pdykstra

Some have compared Trump’s wrecking crew to the one brought in by Ronald Reagan in 1981. But there are crucial differences between then and now.

Marion Doss/flickr

Ronald Reagan routed an incumbent President and chose an EPA Administrator and Interior Secretary who would have been perfect fits in a Trump Administration. The gruff, chainsmoking Anne Gorsuch Burford immediately went to work on EPA’s clout and staff morale. Her ideologically zealous counterpart at Interior, James Gaius Watt, did the same.

Whatever their best/worst intentions, Burford and Watt had strong restraints on their impacts. Both houses of Congress were controlled by Democrats. Beat reporters on the environment occupied network news staffs, virtually every major newspaper coast to coast, and many DC bureaus.

Even many Congressional Republicans had a strong environmental heritage, like Vermont Senator Bob Stafford, Rhode Island’s John Chafee, and Oregon’s Bob Packwood.

None of those safeguards exist today. Congress is in the hands of a Republican Party in full anti-regulatory frenzy. With a few notable exceptions, environmental journalism has been virtually banished from beat status at newspapers, networks, and particularly in the dwindling number of Washington DC bureaus.

The Reagan Administration also gave the world at least one lasting environmental triumph. Its diplomacy was key to the creation of the Montreal Protocol, the global pact that reversed destruction of the stratospheric ozone layer. Back then, George Shultz was Secretary of State.

Now 96 years old, Shultz is one of the most prominent Republican retirees calling for action on climate change. Any such diplomatic breakthrough in the Trump Administration would fall to Rex Tillerson—if his nomination survives bipartisan concern over his bromance with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Print Friendly and PDF
SUBSCRIBE TO EHN'S MUST-READ DAILY NEWSLETTER: ABOVE THE FOLD
Valspar cans. (Credit Lynne Peeples)
Originals

Exposed: Toward a BPA-free future

This is part 4 of a 4-part investigation of the science surrounding the chemical BPA and the U.S. regulatory push to discredit independent evidence of harm while favoring pro-industry science despite significant shortcomings.

Keep reading... Show less
Originals

Clouded in Clarity: A comic on chemicals & controversy

Harmful chemicals are difficult to understand. So, to pair with our investigation, "Exposed" we present EHN's first comic, "Clouded in Clarity," which focuses on BPA and the controversy around an ongoing, massive study on it.

Keep reading... Show less
A barge ships coal up the Ohio River near Cincinnati. (Photo by Lucia Walinchus/Eye on Ohio, the Ohio Center for Investigative Journalism)
Originals

The water is cleaner but the politics are messier: A look back at the Clean Water Act movement after 50 years

In June 1969, a Time Magazine article garnered national attention when it brought to light the water quality conditions in Ohio: a river had literally caught fire.

Keep reading... Show less
From our Newsroom

Above The Fold

Daily & Weekly newsletters all free.