arctic_council/flickr

Sea change of heart for the Secretary?

A stalled international agreement, once championed by Rex Tillerson, soars in significance.

Eighteen months ago, environmental advocates would have been safe in assuming that the new President would choose a new Secretary of State who's a big fan of the Law of the Sea Convention (UNCLOS).


But maybe not quite this: The new President would be Donald Trump, and his sea-hugger of a chief diplomat would be ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson.

In 2012, then-Exxon boss Tillerson sent the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chair a letter offering the oil giant's support to renew the long-stalled push to win U.S. ratification of the Law of the Sea, a United Nations treaty designed to establish a set of rules governing oceans.

In doing so, Tillerson found himself siding with the 168 nations that have ratified the agreement, and opposing most U.S. Republicans and some Democrats who have steadfastly opposed since the 1980s due to what they see as its limiting of U.S. sovereignty—largely because Reagan-era conservatives were still cheesed off at Jimmy Carter for “giving away” the Panama Canal. To Panama.

UNCLOS has increased in relevance ... in things like Putin's lust for the melting Arctic and China's military push via its artificial islands in the South China Sea.

So, let's pause for an acid-trip of a recap: The U.S. reverses its role as an imperfect, but generally progressive force in decades' worth of global environmental agreements on everything from commercial whaling to protecting wetlands and Antarctica in order to drag its anchor on the "Law of the Sea" treaty.

The treaty's been in full force for years, but "full force" is close to meaningless as long as the U.S. is sitting it out. My, how things change. Senator John Kerry and other Democrats lost control of the Senate in the 2012 elections. Kerry left his Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairmanship to replace Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State, only to be replaced by Tillerson in Trump's 2016 election sweep.

UNCLOS has, if anything, increased in relevance, not just in long-simmering issues like regulating deep-sea fishing and mining, but in things like Putin's lust for the melting Arctic and China's military push via its artificial islands in the South China Sea. Those kinds of things were not on anyone's minds when LOS came under serious discussion in the early years of the Reagan Administration.

Russia and China are both LOS signatories, but would likely blow off any LOS rulings that could limit their ambitions. And by sitting the treaty out, the U.S. has no leverage to do so.

Also curious is the parade of GOP secretaries of state and captains of industry who have supported LOS ratification: Henry Kissinger, Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice, the National Association of Manufacturers, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and more. Mind you, none of them, Tillerson included, have done so for the same reasons as enviro advocates.

But both see the U.S. as a player in the Law of the Sea as giving a leg up to American stature to protect the oceans. Or exploit them.

Could Rex T grant an enviro wish? It’s a mystery. Certainly, the Secretary of State’s near-absence from the current, even-bigger diplomatic row—North Korea’s hydrogen bomb hissyfit—isn’t encouraging.

He’s the dude with the diplomacy, but the U.S. is answering North Korea via the dudes with the bombs—President Trump and Defense Secretary “Mad Dog” Mattis. No shocker here, but Trump has been sending out at least a few environmental signals that are downright bipolar.

His new NASA Administrator pick, Oklahoma congressman Jim Bridenstine, is widely seen as a protégé to uber-denier Senator Jim Inhofe and therefore a threat to NASA’s substantial work on climate change. Bridenstine is on record as supporting NASA’s deep-space work, however.

Trump’s nominee for the #2 slot at NOAA is a veteran Navy oceanographer who favors action to curb global warming. Retired Rear Admiral Tim Gallaudet sees a strong role for the agency in climate science.

So we’ll see.

Print Friendly and PDF
SUBSCRIBE TO EHN'S MUST-READ DAILY NEWSLETTER: ABOVE THE FOLD
Valspar cans. (Credit Lynne Peeples)
Originals

Exposed: Toward a BPA-free future

This is part 4 of a 4-part investigation of the science surrounding the chemical BPA and the U.S. regulatory push to discredit independent evidence of harm while favoring pro-industry science despite significant shortcomings.

Keep reading... Show less
Originals

Clouded in Clarity: A comic on chemicals & controversy

Harmful chemicals are difficult to understand. So, to pair with our investigation, "Exposed" we present EHN's first comic, "Clouded in Clarity," which focuses on BPA and the controversy around an ongoing, massive study on it.

Keep reading... Show less
A barge ships coal up the Ohio River near Cincinnati. (Photo by Lucia Walinchus/Eye on Ohio, the Ohio Center for Investigative Journalism)
Originals

The water is cleaner but the politics are messier: A look back at the Clean Water Act movement after 50 years

In June 1969, a Time Magazine article garnered national attention when it brought to light the water quality conditions in Ohio: a river had literally caught fire.

Keep reading... Show less
From our Newsroom

Above The Fold

Daily & Weekly newsletters all free.