CNX’s controversial fracking study sparks debate in Pennsylvania

CNX Resources claims their fracking operations pose no public health risks based on a self-funded study, but climate activists argue the findings contradict peer-reviewed science and past reports of harm to nearby residents.

Audrey Carleton reports for Capital & Main.


In short:

  • CNX Resources, a major Pennsylvania gas producer, released a study downplaying health risks from fracking, sparking criticism from environmentalists.
  • The study comes as CNX seeks federal funding for a hydrogen project, but opponents argue it overlooks proven health hazards from fracking, such as polluted air and water.
  • Activists and researchers question the study’s scientific rigor, arguing that its findings are not supported by long-term or comprehensive data.

Key quote:

"CNX’s radically dishonest and irresponsible fracking report fails the fundamental tests of scientific integrity."

— Alex Bomstein, executive director of Clean Air Council

Why this matters:

Fracking has long been linked to serious health risks, particularly in communities near drilling sites. As CNX pushes to secure public funds, critics fear that flawed data may lead to environmental and public health sacrifices for the sake of industry profits.

Related EHN coverage:

About the author(s):

EHN Curators
EHN Curators
Articles curated and summarized by the Environmental Health News' curation team. Some AI-based tools helped produce this text, with human oversight, fact checking and editing.

You Might Also Like

Recent

Top environmental health news from around the world.

Environmental Health News

Your support of EHN, a newsroom powered by Environmental Health Sciences, drives science into public discussions. When you support our work, you support impactful journalism. It all improves the health of our communities. Thank you!

donate