Minnesota's PFAS crackdown might shape future national policies

Advocates hope Minnesota's strict ban on "forever chemicals" could signal stronger national regulations if Tim Walz joins the White House.

Miranda Willson and Ellie Borst report for E&E News.


In short:

  • Minnesota passed one of the toughest bans on PFAS, sparking hope that a similar approach could be adopted nationwide if Tim Walz becomes Vice President.
  • Walz’s experience with PFAS issues in Minnesota might influence national policy, but legal experts question if a national ban is feasible without congressional support.
  • The current federal government has yet to ban any PFAS uses, leaving room for potential new regulations driven by Walz's background.

Key quote:

“The Minnesota law really is the most protective in the country, and maybe even in the world, at this point.”

— Gretchen Salter, strategic adviser at Safer States

Why this matters:

If Tim Walz’s PFAS crackdown in Minnesota is a sign of things to come, a Harris administration could take the fight against “forever chemicals” to a whole new level. Walz’s leadership in banning PFAS has set a precedent that many environmental advocates are watching closely. Read more: 7 things the White House should do to limit PFAS pollution.

About the author(s):

EHN Curators
EHN Curators
Articles curated and summarized by the Environmental Health News' curation team. Some AI-based tools helped produce this text, with human oversight, fact checking and editing.

You Might Also Like

Recent

Top environmental health news from around the world.

Environmental Health News

Your support of EHN, a newsroom powered by Environmental Health Sciences, drives science into public discussions. When you support our work, you support impactful journalism. It all improves the health of our communities. Thank you!

donate