Despite recent actions by the EPA to regulate some PFAS chemicals in drinking water, much more is necessary to monitor and limit all PFAS, the author argues.
Kathleen Blackburn writes for The New York Times.
In short:
- The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently mandated the reduction of six types of PFAS chemicals in drinking water, a small fraction of the over 12,000 known varieties.
- But PFAS exposure also comes from a wide range of other sources, from consumer products like clothing and nonstick cookware to firefighting foams.
- Comprehensive measures are necessary to restrict and reduce the health risks posed by thousands of PFAS compounds.
Key quote:
"We should not have to risk repeated exposure to the most powerful bonds in organic chemistry caused by the willful negligence of industry each time we place our faith in a glass of water."
— Kathleen Blackburn, author of “Loose of Earth"
Why this matters:
Understanding the impact of PFAS on health and the environment is crucial, as these chemicals are pervasive in everyday products and our surroundings. What are PFAS? Everything you need to know about “forever chemicals” and how to avoid them.
