The vast majority of protected landscapes across Europe are rated as in poor or bad condition and vital species and their habitats continue to decline despite targets aimed at protecting them, according to a report.
Nobody knows precisely how wildfire smoke affects birds' health and migratory patterns. Now, citizen birdwatchers are stepping in.
When businesses started closing because of the pandemic this spring, many joked that nature was reclaiming the land. It turns out that's kind of right.
US artists, hunters and conservationists concerned stamps promote the idea that conservation always involves hunting.
The dramatic reduction in automobile traffic noise in San Francisco during the COVID-19 lockdown has allowed a common songbird to sing songs that are more appealing to the ladies.
Decades ago several bird species in the Great Lakes—including the iconic bald eagle—faced an uncertain future because toxic chemicals were threatening their populations.
Peregrine falcons in Detroit. (Credit: pverdonk/flickr)
“It's a little bit like whack-a-mole”<p>The second <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110151" target="_blank">study</a>, published in <em>Environmental Research </em>this month, showed how peregrine falcons accumulate perfluorinated chemical pollutants like perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which have made headlines in recent years for being "forever chemicals"—since they take exceedingly long times to break down. Human PFAS exposure is linked to cancer, endocrine disruption, and elevated cholesterol, among other health detriments.</p> <p>The study's results suggest that peregrines—birds of prey and one of the most widely found bird species—get exposed to these chemicals through maternal transfer to eggs, their diets via contaminated smaller birds and mammals, and also simply by living in areas with higher levels of these substances. </p> <p>"We're also at the mercy of a shifting chemical landscape," <a href="https://profils-profiles.science.gc.ca/en/profile/robert-j-letcher" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Robert Letcher</a>, an environmental toxicologist at Environment and Climate Change Canada and co-author of the study, told EHN. </p> <p>Despite being largely phased out in North America, perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), a kind of PFAS that was officially added to the Stockholm Convention's list of persistent organic pollutants in 2010, is "still singularly the most bioaccumulative, highest level perfluorinated compound that's being reported in the environment and in the biota," said Letcher. He said the chemical industry is consistently developing new chemicals to replace those that are phased out, chemicals that stay largely secret until they are investigated and identified by scientists like himself.</p> <p>"We have to do a little bit of chemical sleuthing to figure out our targets," Letcher said. Through that sleuthing, he says, scientists have been able to trace PFOS replacements like F53B, GenX, ADONA, and a number of others that are all different minor variations of PFOS, but it's hard to keep up with the sheer number of replacements that just keep coming. </p> <p>This perpetual conveyor belt of toxics, on top of the already varied arsenal of legacy pollutants, makes zeroing in on what each chemical is doing to the falcons' health extremely difficult, <a href="https://profils-profiles.science.gc.ca/en/profile/dr-kim-fernie" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Kim Fernie</a>, another environmental toxicologist at Environment and Climate Change Canada and one of Letcher's co-authors, told EHN. Not to mention that there are a multitude of other environmental factors like climate change that could be acting in tandem, she added.</p> <p>Despite the unknown, the results are concerning, as PFAS chemicals have been previously shown to be overtly toxic. Research in other animals reveals that PFAS decreases reproductive success, can cause developmental defects, endanger kidney and liver health, and even cause cancer—effects that researchers suspect may translate to the health of these falcons and other Great Lakes birds. </p> <p>"As we continue to have these new chemicals crop up, it's a little bit like whack-a-mole," <a href="https://healthylakes.org/contact-us/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Laura Rubin</a>, the director of the Healing Our Waters—Great Lakes Coalition, told EHN. The Coalition is a group of about 165 NGOs and nonprofits throughout the Great Lakes region that pushes for clean water and the protection of landscapes and their wildlife.</p> <p>"What we need now more than ever, is a precautionary principle, the idea that we should not be introducing new pollutants or chemicals until we know the effects," said Rubin. Currently, the onus to prove that a chemical is safe does not lie with the company manufacturing it. Without a precautionary principle, industries are free to release chemicals under presumed ignorance of the harms their products cause to the environment. Scientists and activists then have to identify and raise alarms about each individual pollutant. It becomes a repetitive story with different faces. </p> <p>The destructive chemical pollutants of decades past yielded a few really seminal pieces of legislation, Rubin said—The Clean Water Act, The Clean Air Act, and the National Environmental Policy Act, to name a few. "But those are starting to show their age and they need some updating in terms of responding to these newer classes of chemicals." Getting a precautionary principle in place would be a monumental step forward for protecting our landscapes, she said.</p>
A warning for us all<p>Pollution in the Great Lakes has significant implications for human health as well. According to the <a href="https://waterusedata.glc.org/pdf/2018-Water-Use-Report.pdf" target="_blank">Great Lakes regional Water Use Database</a>, 30 million people depend on the 40.4 billion gallons of water withdrawn from the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin each day. The land around that area is also home to roughly 10 percent of the U.S. population and more than 30 percent of the Canadian population, according to the U.S. <a href="https://www.epa.gov/greatlakes/facts-and-figures-about-great-lakes" target="_blank">Environmental Protection Agency</a>.</p> <p>A <a href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00260" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">2016 study</a> also found that public water supplies with PFAS concentrations at or above the EPA's recommendations reached as many as 6 million U.S. residents. PFAS in food is also of concern, especially via manufactured food, food packaging, and fish consumption. One <a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4419-6880-7_4#Sec2" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">report</a> of PFOS concentrations in fish found the highest levels in lake trout collected from Lake Ontario.</p> <p>These birds being contaminated by all these chemicals are really acting as canaries in the coal mine for us humans, <a href="https://biology.buffalostate.edu/faculty/alicia-perez-fuentetaja" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Alicia Perez-Fuentetaja</a>, an aquatic ecologist at SUNY Buffalo State University and one of Diana Aga's co-authors, told EHN. </p> <p>To Perez-Fuentetaja, the birds should be a warning to us all. </p> <p>"These birds are not even smoking, they're not drinking, they're not doing any of the things we do," she said "They're just eating their food in the wild, and look at the exposure they have." </p>
Researchers find people's exposure to PFAS and certain flame retardants could be significantly reduced by opting for healthier building materials and furniture.
Fish exposed to harmful contaminants can pass on health issues such as reproductive problems to future generations that had no direct exposure.
An expanding wood pellet market in the Southeast has fallen short of climate and job goals—instead bringing air pollution, noise and reduced biodiversity in majority Black communities.