<p>
They see large-scale operations relying on corporate-supplied chemical inputs as the only high-productivity farming model. Another approach might be kinder to the environment and less risky for consumers, but, they assume, it would not be up to the task of providing all the food needed by our still-growing global population.
</p><p>
Contrary to such assumptions, there is ample evidence that an alternative approach—organic agriculture, or more broadly "agroecology"— is actually the
<em>only</em> way to ensure that all people have access to sufficient, healthful food.
</p><p>
Inefficiency and ecological destruction are built into the industrial model. But, beyond that, our ability to meet the world's needs is only partially determined by what quantities are produced in fields, pastures, and waterways.
</p><p>
Wider societal rules and norms ultimately shape whether any given quantity of food produced is actually used to meet humanity's needs. In many ways, how we grow food determines who can eat and who cannot—no matter how much we produce. Solving our multiple food crises thus requires a systems approach in which citizens around the world remake our understanding and practice of democracy.
</p><p>
Today, the world produces—mostly from low-input, smallholder farms—more than enough food: 2,900 calories per person per day. Per capita food availability has continued to expand despite ongoing population growth. This ample supply of food, moreover, comprises only what is left over after about half of all grain is either fed to livestock or used for industrial purposes, such as agrofuels.
</p><p>
Despite this abundance, 800 million people worldwide suffer from long-term caloric deficiencies. One in four children younger than five is deemed stunted—a condition, often bringing lifelong health challenges, that results from poor nutrition and an inability to absorb nutrients.
</p><p>
Two billion people are deficient in at least one nutrient essential for health, with iron deficiency alone implicated in one in five maternal deaths.
</p><p>
The total
<em>supply</em> of food alone actually says little about whether the world's people are able to meet their nutritional needs. We need to ask why the industrial model leaves so many behind, and then determine what questions we <em>should</em> be asking to lead us toward solutions to the global food crisis.
</p>
Keep reading...
Show less
