What Trump’s second term could mean for animal welfare

President-elect Donald Trump’s second term could bring sweeping changes to policies affecting wild, farmed, captive and research animals, with deregulation and industry-friendly practices likely to dominate.

Emily Anthes and Catrin Einhorn report for The New York Times.


In short:

  • Deregulation may harm wildlife by expanding energy development on public lands, reversing protections for vulnerable species and limiting climate change initiatives.
  • Farm animal welfare could see weaker oversight, with policies favoring increased production and slaughter speeds despite safety and humane concerns.
  • Reduced funding and enforcement of the Animal Welfare Act may weaken protections for research and captive animals, while policies on lab testing could reduce animal use but risk public health.

Key quote:

“I expect the second Trump term to be harmful to animals in many ways.”

— Ann Linder, associate director at Harvard University’s animal law and policy program.

Why this matters:

Policy shifts on climate change, land use and regulation under Trump could significantly harm biodiversity and animal welfare. Wild species and farmed animals face increased risks, while lax oversight may undermine protections for captive and research animals, exacerbating ethical and ecological issues.

Related: At the Vatican, a call to avoid 'biological extinction'.

About the author(s):

EHN Curators
EHN Curators
Articles curated and summarized by the Environmental Health News' curation team. Some AI-based tools helped produce this text, with human oversight, fact checking and editing.

You Might Also Like

Recent

Top environmental health news from around the world.

Environmental Health News

Your support of EHN, a newsroom powered by Environmental Health Sciences, drives science into public discussions. When you support our work, you support impactful journalism. It all improves the health of our communities. Thank you!

donate