Federal grazing lands struggle to meet health standards

More than half of the Bureau of Land Management's rangelands fail to uphold environmental health criteria, revealing a systemic neglect of land management.

Jimmy Tobias reports for High Country News.


In short:

  • According to PEER, 56.7 million acres of BLM land across Western states do not meet required health standards, with severe impacts in Nevada.
  • The BLM often skips mandatory environmental reviews for grazing permits due to a legal loophole, risking further degradation.
  • Retired BLM manager Melissa Shawcroft criticizes the agency's indifference to enforcing standards and addressing illegal grazing practices.

Key quote:

"There are millions and millions of acres that are not meeting the BLM’s own health standards. That is the big takeaway here."

— Chandra Rosenthal, director of PEER's Rocky Mountain office

Why this matters:

The Bureau of Land Management, tasked with overseeing millions of acres of public land, is increasingly bypassing required environmental reviews for grazing permits—a practice that taps into a legal gray area and poses risks to diverse ecosystems. This loophole allows the continuation of grazing without a thorough assessment of its impact on soil health, water quality, and biodiversity.

About the author(s):

EHN Curators
EHN Curators
Articles curated and summarized by the Environmental Health News' curation team. Some AI-based tools helped produce this text, with human oversight, fact checking and editing.

You Might Also Like

Recent

Top environmental health news from around the world.

Environmental Health News

Your support of EHN, a newsroom powered by Environmental Health Sciences, drives science into public discussions. When you support our work, you support impactful journalism. It all improves the health of our communities. Thank you!

donate