Supposedly “safe” flame retardants become more toxic when they break down
blue and black audio mixer
Photo by set.sj on Unsplash

Supposedly “safe” flame retardants become more toxic when they break down

Brominated polymers (polyBFRs) - a type of flame retardant that was considered a “safe” alternative to older flame retardant chemicals - breaks down into toxic byproducts once released into the environment, according to a new study published in Nature Sustainability.


In short:

  • PolyBFRs chemicals, often thought of as less toxic than some alternatives because of their large size, break down into at least 76 smaller byproducts.
  • Many of these byproducts were found in the environment around electronic waste recycling facilities in China.
  • Exposure to relatively low levels of these byproducts resulted in developmental toxicity in laboratory studies.

Key quote:

“Although polyBFRs initially seemed to be a more health-protective alternative compared to non-polymeric flame retardants, our work strongly indicates that polyBFR usage can no longer be assumed to be safe for human and environmental health.”

Why this matters:

PolyBFRs and other polymeric flame retardants are produced and used in high volumes due to their reputation as “safe” and “eco-friendly” substitutes to other toxic flame retardant chemicals. In reality, this reputation is only based on an assumption that polyBFRs don’t cause harm, since current regulations have not required any toxicity testing for these chemicals or their byproducts. The authors of this study point to the lack of data and regulatory oversight as a “broader failure of industry and regulatory systems to provide environmental protection.” They note that “if only the direct effects of polyBFRs are considered when drafting possible regulations, clear toxicological harm will be ignored.”

Related EHN coverage:

More resources: The Green Science Policy Institute provides resources on flame retardants and has worked successfully to change regulations, leading to reduced exposure levels to some toxic flame retardant chemicals. Technology Network's coverage of this paper includes an interview with Dr. Arlene Blum of the Green Science Policy Institute and one of the authors of the study.

Liu, Xiaotu et al. for Nature Sustainability. Mar. 3, 2025

About the author(s):

Katherine McMahon
Katherine McMahon
Katherine McMahon is a Science Administrative Assistant at Environmental Health Sciences.
Sarah Howard
Sarah Howard
Howard is the Program Manager at Healthy Environment and Endocrine Disruptor Strategies (HEEDS), a program of Environmental Health Sciences.

You Might Also Like

Recent

Top environmental health news from around the world.

Environmental Health News

Your support of EHN, a newsroom powered by Environmental Health Sciences, drives science into public discussions. When you support our work, you support impactful journalism. It all improves the health of our communities. Thank you!

donate