Kamala Harris’s history of opposing fracking is a sticking point for many Pennsylvania voters whose livelihoods depend on natural gas.
Evan Halper reports for The Washington Post.
In short:
- Harris’s previous support for a fracking ban may alienate voters in Pennsylvania, a state where natural gas is economically vital.
- Despite the Biden-Harris administration’s record on energy production, swing voters remain skeptical of Harris’s commitment to the industry.
- The selection of Tim Walz as her running mate, a strong advocate for green energy, further complicates her appeal to these voters.
Key quote:
“There’s already uncertainty with just what does she believe, what she would do.”
— Jeff Nobers, excecutive director of the coalition of union and business leaders Pittsburgh Works Together.
Why this matters:
Winning Pennsylvania is crucial for Democrats, and Harris’s past anti-fracking stance could impact the 2024 election outcome. Balancing green energy goals with economic realities in fossil fuel-dependent states remains a significant challenge for future administrations.
