Study: Chemical contamination in U.S. drinking water requires "intentional and continuous reform”

In a recent article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, researchers examined the issue of chemical contamination - including pollution from PFAS forever chemicals, pharmaceutical byproducts, agricultural chemicals, and ingredients from personal care products - in U.S. drinking water systems.


In short:

  • Because these contaminants are typically very mobile, persistent, and are toxic at low concentrations that are difficult to detect, they’re often not fully removed by conventional water treatments.
  • Only four U.S. states – California, Maine, Wisconsin, and Vermont – have strong, enforceable regulations and regular monitoring in place to address this type of contamination.
  • The authors of this article emphasize the need for more “proactive regulation,” including policies that put the cost of pollution clean up on the industries that profit from chemical production, rather than on taxpayers.


Key quote:

“Understanding the problem’s scope is only the first step; the more urgent task now is to translate scientific findings into policies that ensure safe drinking water for everyone.”


Why this matters:

Despite being largely unregulated, the toxic chemicals examined in this article have been linked to a wide range of harmful health impacts by a well-established body of science. This lack of action on known toxic threats mirrors past U.S. health crises involving lead and asbestos contamination, which were only addressed with regulation after people were harmed. Even where policies do exist, they’re often incomplete – while six types of PFAS chemicals are regulated in U.S. drinking water, thousands of other PFAS are not subject to any limits or monitoring. The study authors highlight the critical need to recognize that “the consequences of inaction are significant.”


Related EHN coverage:


More resources:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) proposed Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List is open for comment on Regulations.gov at docket number EPA-HQ-OW-2022-0946. Comments are due June 5, 2026. More information on the docket is available from EPA.


Siame, T. et al. (2026). Global Disparities in the Regulation of PFASs: The Risk of Shifting the PFAS Pollution Burden to Developing Countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research

About the author(s):

Environmental Health Sciences  Staff
Environmental Health Sciences Staff
Environmental Health Sciences is the publisher of Environmental Health News. Some Environmental Health Sciences staff members are involved in policy and/or advocacy work related to the topics covered in our science summaries.

You Might Also Like

Recent

Top environmental health news from around the world.

Environmental Health News

Your support of EHN, a newsroom powered by Environmental Health Sciences, drives science into public discussions. When you support our work, you support impactful journalism. It all improves the health of our communities. Thank you!

donate