As the $7,500 federal subsidy for electric vehicles ends September 30, buyers face shifting economics that could affect whether going electric still saves money.
Francesca Paris reports for The New York Times.
In short:
- Electric vehicles usually cost more upfront than gas cars, but lower maintenance and fuel costs often make up the difference over time.
- Leasing an EV can be a better financial deal than buying right now, as income restrictions don't apply and dealers can pass on the federal subsidy.
- EVs generate more emissions during manufacturing, but produce far fewer emissions than gas cars during their lifetime.
Why this matters:
The coming shift in federal subsidies could slow electric vehicle adoption just as the U.S. tries to cut transportation emissions—one of the country’s largest sources of greenhouse gases. While EVs offer long-term cost savings and major reductions in tailpipe pollution, the high initial price can still deter buyers without incentives. Fossil fuel combustion from vehicles releases fine particulate matter and nitrogen oxides, both linked to asthma, heart disease, and premature death, particularly in low-income and urban communities. EVs don’t eliminate environmental impacts — manufacturing their batteries is resource-intensive — but they avoid the steady stream of toxic exhaust. As climate extremes worsen and air pollution continues to affect public health, especially for children and the elderly, the structure of subsidies and who can access them will help determine the pace of the transition to cleaner transportation.
Related: California pushes ahead on electric vehicle plans despite federal rollback
