Musk’s Starlink launches spark calls from scientists for a federal review of environmental risks

A coalition of over 100 researchers is urging the federal government to halt new low-orbit satellite launches, including Musk’s Starlink, until environmental impacts are thoroughly studied.

Sarah Fortinsky reports for The Hill.


In short:

  • Researchers wrote to the FCC, warning that low-orbit satellites could cause environmental harm, including atmospheric pollution from reentry burns.
  • The letter highlights the lack of current regulatory review and the FCC’s "first-come, first-served" licensing, which prioritizes commercial over environmental considerations.
  • They call for the FCC to end its satellite environmental review exemption and encourage international collaboration to manage orbital space.

Key quote:

“The environmental harms of launching and burning up so many satellites aren’t clear. That’s because the federal government hasn’t conducted an environmental review to understand the impacts.”

— Researchers’ letter to the FCC

Why this matters:

Unchecked satellite launches risk introducing pollutants into the atmosphere and increasing space debris, posing threats to both Earth’s environment and the long-term safety of space exploration. Without regulatory changes, private entities could determine the environmental fate of space without accountability.

About the author(s):

EHN Curators
EHN Curators
Articles curated and summarized by the Environmental Health News' curation team. Some AI-based tools helped produce this text, with human oversight, fact checking and editing.

You Might Also Like

Recent

Top environmental health news from around the world.

Environmental Health News

Your support of EHN, a newsroom powered by Environmental Health Sciences, drives science into public discussions. When you support our work, you support impactful journalism. It all improves the health of our communities. Thank you!

donate