The Environmental Protection Agency has revoked $20 billion in climate grants issued under the Inflation Reduction Act, escalating a legal fight over the program’s future and the president's authority to withhold funds appropriated by Congress.
Alex Guillén and Zack Colman report for POLITICO.
In short:
- EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin cited concerns about oversight, fraud, and misalignment with agency priorities as reasons for terminating the grants, though no specific cases of fraud were identified.
- The decision affects multiple recipients, including Climate United Fund, which has sued to access funds held in a Citibank account that the Trump administration froze.
- Democratic lawmakers argue the move is politically motivated and undermines a congressionally authorized program meant to finance clean energy and housing projects.
Key quote:
“Zeldin and Trump are spreading lies in a last-ditch effort to terminate the climate bank because the truth is it will help households save money and deploy clean energy — exactly what Big Oil is afraid of."
— Sen. Ed Markey, D-Massachusetts
Why this matters:
The funding cuts in question could have sweeping consequences for climate and clean energy initiatives, particularly those aimed at curbing greenhouse gas emissions and assisting economically disadvantaged communities. Many of these projects, established under the Biden administration, rely on federal grants to support renewable energy development, efficiency upgrades, and pollution reduction efforts.
Beyond the immediate impact on climate programs, the outcome of this legal fight could set a precedent for how future administrations manage federal funds, raising critical questions about the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches. For communities and industries that depend on these grants, the uncertainty adds yet another layer of complexity to an already shifting policy landscape.
Related: Nonprofits still blocked from $20 billion in climate funds amid investigations
