North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein vetoed a bill that would repeal a key 2030 carbon emissions reduction goal, citing concerns over energy costs and the state’s clean energy future.
Gary D. Robertson reports for The Associated Press.
In short:
- The vetoed bill would have eliminated a requirement for North Carolina to cut power sector carbon emissions 70% from 2005 levels by 2030, though a 2050 carbon neutrality goal would remain.
- Supporters, including Duke Energy and Republican lawmakers, argue the rollback would reduce costs by at least $13 billion and allow cheaper power generation methods in the short term.
- Opponents, including environmental groups and Gov. Stein, say the repeal weakens climate commitments and could raise long-term energy costs due to continued reliance on volatile natural gas.
Key quote:
The bill “walks back our state’s commitment to reduce carbon emissions, sending the wrong signal to businesses that want to be a part of our clean energy economy.”
— Josh Stein, governor of North Carolina
Why this matters:
Greenhouse gas mandates shape how utilities invest in energy infrastructure, influencing public health, economic growth, and environmental resilience. Repealing near-term emissions targets could slow the shift from fossil fuels to renewables, extending dependence on natural gas and other high-emission sources. That reliance brings volatility and long-term costs as fuel prices fluctuate and federal climate policies evolve. North Carolina’s original 2030 target was part of a broader movement among states to modernize power generation and reduce pollution-related harms like asthma, heart disease, and heat-related illness. Rolling back the mandate may ease short-term utility expenses but could delay benefits tied to cleaner air, stable rates, and climate resilience.
Related: Coal use drives sharp rise in U.S. power plant emissions amid summer heat
