Scientists and environmental groups say petrochemical companies and oil-producing nations are dominating United Nations negotiations to curb plastic pollution, undermining efforts to limit production.
Damian Carrington reports for The Guardian.
In short:
- Lobbyists from major plastics and fossil fuel companies outnumber scientists and some national delegations at treaty talks, giving them access to sensitive sessions and shaping negotiations.
- More than 100 nations back a cap on plastic production, but petrostates led by Saudi Arabia oppose limits and push for recycling-focused solutions instead.
- Critics allege harassment of scientists, lack of conflict-of-interest rules, and close ties between the UN Environment Programme and industry players have weakened the treaty process.
Key quote:
“The amount of plastic that we’re already producing today is entirely unmanageable. There’s no way, technically or policy wise, that we can manage it. But the companies’ objective is to produce more and miraculously somehow reduce the overall impact.”
— David Azoulay, senior attorney at the Center for International Environmental Law
Why this matters:
Plastic production drives fossil fuel demand and contributes to climate change, while discarded plastics and their chemical additives spread through air, water, soil, and food chains. Scientists have found microplastics in human organs, breast milk, and even the brain, raising concerns about long-term health effects. The pace of production — projected to triple by 2060 — risks overwhelming waste management systems and intensifying pollution in rivers and oceans already clogged with debris. The outcome of these treaty negotiations will have enormous influence on whether global policy prioritizes corporate recycling efforts or tackles production at the source.
Read more:
