The fate of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, one of the wildest places in the U.S., is at stake as local communities and environmentalists clash over oil and gas development on the land.
Juliet Eilperin, Carolyn Van Houten, and Alice Li report for The Washington Post.
In short:
- The small village of Kaktovik relies on oil tax revenue, but residents face a paradox: the push for development could threaten their environment.
- The local Iñupiat community is divided, with some supporting drilling for economic reasons and others fighting to preserve the wildlife, particularly the Porcupine caribou herd and polar bears.
- Oil companies have retreated due to environmental concerns, but a second lease sale in 2024 could reignite interest.
Key quote:
“The refuge with development is a city. … If we lose these big areas of public lands, we will lose these species.”
— Martin Robards, regional director of the Wildlife Conservation Society’s Arctic Beringia Program
Why this matters:
For now, the Arctic refuge remains caught between two futures. The stakes aren’t just about local jobs or energy independence—they’re about the survival of one of the last true wildernesses and the traditional way of life that depends on it. Read more: Biden’s Arctic drilling go-ahead illustrates the limits of democratic problem solving.
