Q&A with Pennsylvania State Senator Gene Yaw

Our reporting found toxic exposures in Pennsylvania families living near fracking. What do politicians have to say?

On March 1, EHN published Fractured, a 4-part series documenting the results of a two-year study on fracking and health, which found high levels of toxic chemicals in the bodies of Pennsylvania families in fracking communities.


In response to the reporting, 35 lawmakers representing both the state House and Senate issued a public letter calling on Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf to take "immediate action in response to the ongoing harm" from fracking.

EHN reached out to 37 other local and state lawmakers who didn't sign the letter to share our findings and request a response. Pennsylvania State Senator Gene Yaw was among them.

Yaw is a Republican who has represented Pennsylvania's 23rd District, which includes Bradford, Lycoming, Sullivan, and Union Counties, and part of Susquehanna County, since 2009. In November, Yaw was among the group of 12 Pennsylvania Senate Republicans who met with Rudy Guliani and Donald Trump to brainstorm ways to overturn the results of the state's presidential election.

Yaw chairs the Pennsylvania Environmental Resources & Energy Committee; he provided comments about his relationship to the oil and gas industry prior to publication, which are included in the series. EHN sent a brief summary of what our investigation found along with a short list of questions to Sen. Yaw and requested a follow-up interview.

Instead of agreeing to an interview or responding to our specific questions, Yaw's Chief of Staff Nick Troutman sent the following statement on behalf of the State Senator:

"This particular study by EHN is obviously another Heinz-Foundation-funded project attacking shale. EHN received $1.4 million from the Heinz Foundation. With respect to this particular report, even the authors acknowledge that the work is not peer reviewed, is unpublished in scientific journals, and 'should not be used to make scientific determinations.'"

Related: Fractured: About our data

Editor's note: The Heinz Foundation is one of many EHN funders. Our organization has not received $1.4 million from the Heinz Foundation. We used funding from readers and from various grants to conduct the Fractured study. EHN is a nonprofit newsroom and is editorially independent from its funders. EHN has never stated that its research "should not be used to make scientific determinations" because it has yet to undergo peer review.

Banner photo credit: Pennsylvania Senate Republican Caucus, CC BY 3.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

Print Friendly and PDF
SUBSCRIBE TO EHN'S MUST-READ DAILY NEWSLETTER: ABOVE THE FOLD
From our Newsroom

Following up with families from ‘Fractured,’ EHN’s fracking investigation in western Pennsylvania

"The series finally brought to light that we're not the only ones being impacted, that this is a serious problem across the board, and that the industry should be held accountable."

CICADA-PALOOZA!

Invasives and invasions pit humans versus nature.

Solar geoengineering: Scientists decry a 'foolish' idea

Ideas to dim the sun 'ignore the root cause' of the climate crisis – and create a cascade of unintended problems, scientists and activists say

Is it up to consumers, businesses, or politicians to tackle toxics? All of the above.

We all have a role to play in ridding our shelves of unhealthy products that are more likely to end up harming low-income families.

Fractured: The body burden of living near fracking

EHN.org scientific investigation finds western Pennsylvania families near fracking are exposed to harmful chemicals, and regulations fail to protect communities' mental, physical, and social health.

LISTEN: A trip down the crooked river

"Now that the water is clean, now that the fish are back ... it is so clean and glorious that everybody wants to be there."

Above The Fold

Daily & Weekly newsletters all free.