Ohioans fund coal plants while Duke Energy knew the climate risks

Ohio ratepayers are subsidizing aging coal plants while Duke Energy, a major shareholder, long knew coal burning contributed to climate change.

Marty Schladen reports for Ohio Capital Journal.


In short:

  • Ohio’s House Bill 6 forces ratepayers to subsidize two polluting coal plants, with over $400 million paid so far.
  • A new report shows Duke Energy knew for decades that burning coal drives global warming but spread disinformation to obscure the risks.
  • Despite acknowledging climate change now, Duke still works to block competition from renewable energy sources.

Key quote:

“The company doesn’t plan to achieve net-zero carbon emissions until 2050, by which time the climate crisis could cause an additional 14.5 million deaths and $12.5 trillion in economic losses worldwide.”

— Energy and Policy Institute report

Why this matters:

Coal plants funded by ratepayers accelerate climate change, worsening storms and environmental damage. Utilities’ past efforts to delay climate action have prolonged reliance on fossil fuels, increasing pollution and costs for future generations.

Read more: North Carolina town takes utility giant to court over climate inaction

About the author(s):

EHN Curators
EHN Curators
Articles curated and summarized by the Environmental Health News' curation team. Some AI-based tools helped produce this text, with human oversight, fact checking and editing.

You Might Also Like

Recent

Top environmental health news from around the world.

Environmental Health News

Your support of EHN, a newsroom powered by Environmental Health Sciences, drives science into public discussions. When you support our work, you support impactful journalism. It all improves the health of our communities. Thank you!

donate