Utility commissioners in several states are benefiting from campaign contributions tied to the very industries they regulate, raising concerns about conflicts of interest that could shape energy policy and slow the clean energy transition.
Mario Alejandro Ariza, Miranda Green and Pam Radtke report for Floodlight.
In short:
- Floodlight’s analysis found that fossil fuel and utility interests contributed over $13.5 million to utility commission candidates in nine states, allowing these industries to influence regulatory decisions.
- Commissioners who receive the most donations from utility-linked sources tend to stay in office longer, entrenching policies that favor fossil fuels over renewable energy.
- In states like Alabama, high utility costs and restrictive policies on solar energy reflect the power of these contributions, which limit renewable energy development and maintain fossil fuel dominance.
Key quote:
“It’s kind of ludicrous on its face…that commercial entities directly regulated by these people are allowed to give these people money.”
— David Roberts, Volts podcast host
Why this matters:
As long as these industries are allowed to invest in the campaigns of those who regulate them, it's everyday people who pay the price—financially, environmentally, and in lost health benefits. Read more: Amid LNG’s Gulf Coast expansion, community hopes to stand in its way.
