Print Friendly and PDF
Shell petrochemical plastics
Shell's new petrochemical complex in southwestern Pennsylvania. (Credit: Nate Smallwood for Environmental Health News and Sierra Magazine)

After repeated air pollution violations, Shell plastics plant hit with federal lawsuit

“Shell’s persistent law-breaking must end."

3 min read

This story was originally published in The New Lede, a journalism project of the Environmental Working Group, and is republished here with permission.


A unit of the British multinational Shell plc is repeatedly violating state and federal air pollution rules and harming the health of area residents, according to a lawsuit filed Thursday in federal court by an environmental group after a series of air permit violations at the company’s new plastics production plant in Pennsylvania.

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania by the Clean Air Council against Shell Chemical Appalachia, seeks monetary penalties and demands an end to the plant’s release of illegally high levels of pollutants that include nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

VOCs can cause difficulty breathing, nausea and damage the central nervous system and other organs, according to the American Lung Association. Some can cause cancer.

“Illegal air emissions, smoking flares, and malfunctions at the Plant have resulted in excess emissions of VOCs, NOx, particulate matter (“PM”), benzene, and other harmful pollution,” the complaint states.

Shell did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The filing comes six months after Shell announced the start of operations at the plant in November and one month after a malfunction at the facility’s waste water treatment system caused a chemical leak that released a foul odor and sent cancer-causing benzene and other toxics over the fence-line and into the surrounding community.

Residents reported experiencing headaches, nausea, irritated throats and watery eyes during the April 11 chemical leak incident. Shell’s passive air monitors recorded benzene levels of up to 110 micrograms per cubic meter that week, far exceeding the 29 micrograms per cubic meter minimal risk level under federal guidelines.

In addition to the benzene release, uncombusted emissions documented by optical gas imaging spewed from the plant’s ground flare on April 13 and 14, according to video released by the environmental organization Earthworks. These incidents were just the latest in a series of what the groups say are major pollution events at Shell’s Pennsylvania facility.

During an hours-long flaring incident on February 13, the plant generated plumes of black smoke and fiery flames. Another flaring event on March 14 lasted several hours and there were reports of disruptive noise and light pollution up to ten miles away.

The plant has been the site of multiple malfunctions, both in preparing to come online and after operations began. Shell has submitted 39 malfunction reports to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) since January 2022. The state regulatory agency has issued 12 Notices of Violation to the company pertaining to air permit violations during that same time period.

Related: The Titans of Plastic

In February 2022, the Pennsylvania DEP imposed a civil penalty of $4,313 for air permit violations, but has not taken any further enforcement action.

Critics have repeatedly asked the state regulators to order a temporary shutdown of the facility to protect local residents and address the plant’s ongoing pollution problems.

“Shell’s persistent law-breaking must end. The community will not tolerate dangerous pollution events that risk the health of families across Beaver County and beyond,” Joseph Minott, executive director of the Clean Air Council, said in a statement.

Shell’s massive petrochemical facility, located on the banks of the Ohio River in western Pennsylvania, is designed to process a chemical feedstock derived from oil and gas into polyethylene, a building block of plastics. It is the largest plastics production facility in the northeastern United States and Shell’s largest petrochemical plant outside the Gulf Coast. Pennsylvania taxpayers are subsidizing the Shell Polymers Monaca facility with a $1.6 billion tax break.

In a webcast presentation to investors last week, Shell CEO Wael Sawan acknowledged the plant’s difficulties and said the company was working to address the problems.

But environmental and community groups say immediate action is needed.

“The very least this international corporation can do is to follow the law and not make Pennsylvania taxpayers breathe in their illegal pollution,” Sarah Kula, an attorney for the Environmental Integrity Project who helped bring the case, said in an announcement of the lawsuit.

About the author(s):

Dana Drugmand

Dana Drugmand is freelance environmental journalist covering climate and energy topics.

Become a donor
Today's top news

LISTEN: Nsilo Berry on making buildings healthier

“When it comes to healthy materials, I like to advocate for solutions that become sensible and viable.”

From our newsroom

Opinion: UN plastics treaty should prioritize health and climate change

Delegates should push for a treaty that takes a full-lifecycle approach to plastic pollution.

Op-ed: Reducing soil toxics in community gardens

How different groups engaged in community gardens can cultivate partnerships and practices to reduce harmful chemical exposures.

Opinión: Reducir los tóxicos en los suelos de las huertas comunitarias

De como los diferentes grupos involucrados en las huertas comunitarias pueden cultivar alianzas y prácticas que reduzcan la exposición a químicos dañinos.

Visiting health care professionals take “environmental justice tour” of Pittsburgh

Doctors, nurses and hospital staff from across the country learned about the city’s ongoing problems with pollution.

Stay safe this summer: Ditch sunscreens with “troublesome” oxybenzone, experts say

Fewer US sunscreens contain oxybenzone, an ingredient with health and safety concerns