South Dakota's water quality falls short of state standards

A new report reveals that 80% of South Dakota's surface water doesn't meet state criteria for intended uses.

Joshua Haiar reports for South Dakota Searchlight.


In short:

  • The state's evaluation of rivers, streams, and lakes shows a significant majority fail to support activities like swimming and fishing due to pollution.
  • Pollution sources include agricultural runoff and E. coli from livestock, with mercury levels in fish also cited as a growing concern.
  • Despite some improvements in areas like the Big Sioux River, challenges in data sharing and reliance on volunteer efforts for pollution prevention raise concerns.

Why this matters:

South Dakota’s waterways, ranging from the Missouri River to smaller streams and lakes, are pivotal for agriculture, drinking water, and recreation. However, they face pollution threats from various sources including agricultural runoff, industrial discharges, and inadequate wastewater treatment. Agricultural runoff, the most significant, introduces nitrates, phosphorus, and pesticides into water bodies. These contaminants can lead to algal blooms which deplete oxygen in the water, harming aquatic life and disrupting ecosystems.

When it comes to water contamination, bacteria are often seen as the problem. In some cases, they can be part of the solution instead.

About the author(s):

EHN Curators
EHN Curators
Articles curated and summarized by the Environmental Health News' curation team. Some AI-based tools helped produce this text, with human oversight, fact checking and editing.

You Might Also Like

Recent

Top environmental health news from around the world.

Environmental Health News

Your support of EHN, a newsroom powered by Environmental Health Sciences, drives science into public discussions. When you support our work, you support impactful journalism. It all improves the health of our communities. Thank you!

donate