As major tech firms like Amazon and Google invest in nuclear energy for carbon neutrality, experts remain divided on whether nuclear power can meet urgent climate targets.
Martin Kuebler reports for Deutsche Welle.
In short:
- Nuclear energy proponents highlight its zero carbon emissions during operation, with companies like Microsoft securing long-term nuclear deals to power data centers.
- Critics argue nuclear projects take too long to build, with costly delays and unresolved issues around radioactive waste and reactor safety.
- Small modular reactors (SMRs) are promoted as faster and safer but remain unproven at commercial scale, with only a few built globally.
Key quote:
"Renewable energies consistently outperform nuclear power in terms of cost and deployment speed and are therefore chosen over nuclear power in most countries."
— 2024 World Nuclear Industry Status Report
Why this matters:
Balancing climate goals with energy security is critical as global energy demand rises. Nuclear energy could help provide consistent, carbon-free power, but slow timelines and risks may limit its impact compared to renewables like wind and solar.
Read more: Andrew Forrest criticizes nuclear energy as a distraction in climate debate
