Wyoming continues legal battle against coal regulations despite Supreme Court decision

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to block new EPA regulations forcing coal plants to reduce emissions or shut down, leaving Wyoming and other coal-reliant states to fight the rules in lower courts.

Dustin Bleizeffer reports for WyoFile.


In short:

  • Wyoming's coal industry faces closure or costly retrofits as EPA rules require steep emissions cuts by 2032.
  • Wyoming is part of ongoing lawsuits to overturn the regulations, citing the economic impacts on coal-dependent communities.
  • Utilities argue that retrofitting coal plants with carbon capture technology remains financially unviable.

Key quote:

"Intentionally making reliable and dispatchable energy needlessly more expensive will kill people."

— Rep. John Bear, R-Gillette

Why this matters:

Wyoming's coal industry provides electricity to half the nation’s coal-fired power plants, making these federal rules a serious threat to the state's economy. As coal plants close or convert, communities reliant on coal jobs face a future of economic uncertainty.

Related: Wyoming hesitates to embrace solar energy despite its potential

About the author(s):

EHN Curators
EHN Curators
Articles curated and summarized by the Environmental Health News' curation team. Some AI-based tools helped produce this text, with human oversight, fact checking and editing.

You Might Also Like

Recent

Top environmental health news from around the world.

Environmental Health News

Your support of EHN, a newsroom powered by Environmental Health Sciences, drives science into public discussions. When you support our work, you support impactful journalism. It all improves the health of our communities. Thank you!

donate