Study Finds Wireless EMF Radiation Exposure Disrupts Bat Behavior for Hours

A recent study published by Lindecke et al. in Science found that brief exposures to wireless radiofrequency (RF) radiation, a type of electromagnetic field (EMF), disrupted flight navigation in bats for several hours beyond the exposure period.


In short:

  • Bats exposed to RF radiation consistently flew in random directions, rather than the normal directional behavior of the nonexposed controls.
  • This disorientation was reproducible and occurred regardless of the timing of exposure, lasting for several hours after exposure ended.
  • The authors state artificial EMF may act as “a stressor for wildlife” as effects occurred at levels within the human safety thresholds for RF radiation exposure set by the International Commission for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP).


Key quote:

“The widely anticipated increase of electromagnetic pollution as a consequence of urbanization trends and global proliferation of wireless technology may further add to the effects of anthropogenic climate change and land conversion by disrupting migratory movements of wildlife.”


Why this matters:

This study adds to a growing body of research reporting that non-ionizing EMF - which is emitted by power lines, electrical substation, cell towers, and other forms of wireless infrastructure - can impact wildlife.

Numerous studies have reported that EMFs can disrupt spatial orientation in several species of mammals, birds, and invertebrates as detailed in a commentary accompanying this study, written by wildlife biologist Alfonzo Balmori, who has been publishing research on wildlife impacts for decades. Balmori states that “electromagnetic noise has other effects on wildlife beyond perturbing animal orientation. Even low-intensity human-generated EMFs can affect internal processes such as metabolism, neurotransmission, and gene expression and disrupt the locomotor and foraging behavior, reproduction, and survival of species from multiple taxonomic groups.”

However, while wildlife exposures to cell tower RF radiation and other forms of artificial EMFs are rapidly increasing due to the massive expansion of wireless networks and the electrical infrastructure required to support AI and data centers, there are currently no regulations in place anywhere in the world specifically intended to protect animals or ecosystems from chronic EMF exposure. Numerous experts caution that EMF limits are outdated and focused solely on humans, failing to account for the growing body of research on wildlife impacts and leaving animals and ecosystems largely unprotected.


Lindecke, O. et al. (2026). Disruptive effects of brief radiofrequency noise exposure on migratory bat navigation. Science.


Related EHN coverage:


More resources:

About the author(s):

Environmental Health Sciences  Staff
Environmental Health Sciences Staff
Environmental Health Sciences is the publisher of Environmental Health News. Some Environmental Health Sciences staff members are involved in policy and/or advocacy work related to the topics covered in our science summaries.

You Might Also Like

Recent

Top environmental health news from around the world.

Environmental Health News

Your support of EHN, a newsroom powered by Environmental Health Sciences, drives science into public discussions. When you support our work, you support impactful journalism. It all improves the health of our communities. Thank you!

donate